Announcement PDF ASX Announcement ASX:DY6 8 July 2025 DY6 significantly expands size of the Central Rutile Project HIGHLIGHTS ▪ DY6 has acquired 100% of 6 exploration licence applications prospective for Rutile and Heavy Mineral Sands (HMS) projects in Cameroon ▪ The acquisition significantly increases DY6’s landholding in central Cameroon to 4,974km2 from 2,124km2. With the inclusion of the Douala Basin HMS Project, DY6 now holds 100% of 7,554km2 of licences in Cameroon ▪ The new licences will be incorporated into Company’s Central Rutile Project and sit immediately south of Peak Minerals’ (ASX:PUA) Minta Project ▪ During the recent due diligence site visit undertaken by the Company and its technical consultants, both alluvial and eluvial (residual) sources of rutile and HMS were observed DY6 Metals Ltd (ASX: DY6, “DY6” or “Company”) is pleased to announce the acquisition of 100% of 6 exploration licence applications (which make up the Weaver Project) prospective for Rutile and Heavy Mineral Sands (HMS) in Central Cameroon (Acquisition). The Acquisition will see the Weaver Project be integrated into the Company’s existing Central Rutile Project, significantly expanding the project landholding from 2,124km2 to 4,974km2 (Figure 1). The 6, contiguous licences, are underlain by a bedrock of kyanite-bearing mica schist which is thought to be the primary source of the rutile, which is then concentrated and upgraded within the overlying saprolite material during the in-situ weathering process. The most eastern licence, Ayene II, is underlain by alkaline intrusions and granitoids, with similarities to Minta Est, which has returned high-grade monazite (up to 73%) and zircon (up to 28%)1. During the recent due diligence site visit undertaken by the Company and its technical consultants, alluvial and eluvial (residual) sources of rutile and HM were observed across the new licence areas. Executive Chairman, Dan Smith, commented: “The acquisition of this new licence package more than doubles our landholding in this highly prospective area of Central Cameroon. Desktop work as well as a recent due diligence site visit, indicates that the Weaver Project area is underlain by the same favourable geology that we have seen at our existing Central Rutile Project. We are also highly encouraged by the results that Peak Minerals has reported to date from their Minta Project which borders us to the north and look forward to getting back in the field.” Cautionary Statement: The Company cautions that, with respect to any visual mineralisation indicators, visual observations and estimates of mineral abundance and uncertain in nature and should not be taken as a substitute or proxy for appropriate laboratory analysis. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. Assay results from the drilling and sampling programmes will be required to understand the grade and extent of mineralisation. Initial assay results are expected in the September quarter. 1 Refer Peak Minerals ASX Announcement dated 19 June 2025 “High value rare earth-rich monazite assemblage confirmed at Minta Est” Registered Office Level 8, 99 St Georges Terrace Perth WA 6000 P: +61 8 9486 4036 E: info@dy6metals.com dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 1 A World Class Project in an Emerging, Globally Significant Rutile Province With the acquisition of the six Weaver licence applications, the newly expanded Central Rutile Project now includes a total of 11 exploration licences under application covering a total landholding of 4,974km2. This project is predominantly underlain by the same kyanite-bearing mica schist unit which is interpreted to be the primary source of the rutile in this region. The Central Cameroon area has long been known to contain rutile with historical production of high purity (>95 %) rutile recorded from artisanal mining of the alluvial deposits around Nanga-Eboko between 1935 and 1955. Recent studies have highlighted the similarities of the region to the Lilongwe Plain of Central Malawi where Sovereign Metals is busy developing the Tier 1 Kasiya Project, which is currently noted as the world largest primary rutile deposit with a resource of 1.8 billion tons at 1.0% rutile. Similar to Kasiya, the Central Cameroon region has the same high grade metamorphic bed rock geology, in the form of a kyanite-bearing mica schist, as well as a deep in-situ saprolitic weathering profile. These factors make this region highly prospective for residual, in-situ, saprolite hosted natural rutile deposits, analogous to Kasiya. Central Cameroon is fast emerging as a globally significant rutile province and DY6’s newly expanded Central Rutile Project comprises just under 5,000km2 of world class tenure directly within the heart of it. Figure 1: Map of Central Cameroon showing DY6’s newly acquired six Weaver licences to the southeast which will be incorporated into the Central Rutile Project together with the company’s original 5 licences. dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 2 Figure 2: Regional geological map of Central Cameroon showing DY6’s Central Rutile Project, along with Peak Minerals’ Minta Project, both underlain by a sequence of high-grade paragneisses and schists. Due diligence sampling at the Weaver Project During a recent site visit to Cameroon by the Company’s management and technical team, the Company undertook a due diligence reconnaissance auger and channel sampling programme at the Weaver. The Company completed 1 auger drill hole, collecting 4 samples in the process, as well as collected 22 channel samples from 4 road cutting exposures in order to assess the residual, eluvial rutile potential of the project. A further 4 stream sediment samples were panned to visually assess HM concentrate (refer Tables 1-3). Table 1: Reconnaissance auger drill hole completed at the Weaver Project showing maximum visual estimates of HM% from panned concentrate of the 1m samples. Hole ID Licence Coordinate System Northing Easting EOH Depth Max Visual Estimate Comment SOLAU0001 Soleye UTM_33N 422060 262745 3m 2% Fine grained HM Cautionary Statement: The Company cautions that, with respect to any visual mineralisation indicators, visual observations and estimates of mineral abundance and uncertain in nature and should not be taken as a substitute or proxy for appropriate laboratory analysis. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. Assay results from the drilling and sampling programmes will be required to understand the grade and extent of mineralisation. Initial assay results are expected in the September quarter. dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 3 Table 2: Reconnaissance channel sample localities completed at the Weaver Project showing maximum visual estimates of HM% from panned concentrate of the 1m samples. Hole ID Licence Coordinate System Northing Easting EOH Depth Max Visual Estimate Comment BISGB0001 Bissoua II UTM_33N 418064 258004 5m 2.5% Fine grained HM SOLGB0001 Soleye UTM_33N 429564 261712 4m 1% Fine grained HM SOLGB0002 Soleye UTM_33N 434336 257069 8m 1% Fine grained HM SOLGB0003 Soleye UTM_33N 435695 254391 5.6m 10% Fine grained HM Incl. 5% rutile Table 3: Reconnaissance stream sediment samples from the Weaver Project showing maximum visual estimates of HM% from panned concentrate of the 1m samples. These samples were panned for visual HM estimates and weren’t retained for assays (due to the focus being on the residual potential of the project). Hole ID Licence Coordinate System Northing Easting Max Visual Estimate Comment BISTT0001 Bissoua II UTM_33N 412990 257986 5% Dark, fine HMC BISTT0002 Bissoua II UTM_33N 411990 257082 5% Fine grained HM BISTT0003 Bissoua II UTM_33N 409536 253992 5% Fine grained HM BISTT0004 Bissoua II UTM_33N 410163 253624 5% Fine grained HM Note that all the hand auger and road-cutting channel samples showed visible HM after panning. This is considered highly promising in terms of the project being prospective for residual natural rutile mineralization. Cautionary Statement: The Company cautions that, with respect to any visual mineralisation indicators, visual observations and estimates of mineral abundance and uncertain in nature and should not be taken as a substitute or proxy for appropriate laboratory analysis. Visual estimates also potentially provide no information regarding impurities or deleterious physical properties relevant to valuations. Assay results from the drilling and sampling programmes will be required to understand the grade and extent of mineralisation. Initial assay results are expected in the September quarter. dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 4 Figure 3: One metre samples from the SOLAU0001 hand auger hole. Figure 4: One metre channel sample locations from the BISGB0001 road-cutting exposure. dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 5 Figure 5: One metre channel sample locations from the SOLGB0001 road-cutting exposure. Figure 6: One metre channel sample locations from the SOLGB0002 road-cutting exposure. dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 6 Figure 7: One metre channel sample locations from the SOLGB0003 road-cutting exposure. Figure 8: Due-diligence sampling localities within the newly acquired Weaver package. dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 7 Key terms of the Acquisition The Company has entered into a binding agreement with Gondwana Capital Pty Ltd, the vendor of NEM Minerals Pty Ltd (NEM) to acquire 100% of the issued capital of NEM. The vendor is not a related party of the Company. The Company confirms that Gondwana Capital is a company associated with Technical Consultant, Mr Cliff Fitzhenry. NEM, through its wholly owned Cameroonian subsidiary, Weaver Resources Ltd, is the 100% legal and beneficial owner of 6 valid exploration permit applications comprising the Weaver Project, as set out in the Annexure. In consideration for the Acquisition, subject to shareholder approval, the Company will pay the Vendors the following: • Upfront Consideration: o o • $125,000 in cash; and 2,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares at a deemed issue price of $0.10 per share (approximate value of $200,000), (together, the Upfront Consideration). Deferred Consideration: 6 months post Settlement, DY6 will pay to the Vendors (by way of electronic transfer into an account or accounts as nominated by the Vendors) the sum of A$125,000 in cash (Deferred Cash Consideration); o 12 months post Settlement, DY6 will issue to the Vendors 2,000,000 fully paid ordinary shares in the Company, each having a deemed issue price of $0.10 per Share (Deferred Share Consideration); and o The existing Performance Rights the subject of the previous transaction between DY6 and the Vendors will apply to and incorporate the Weaver Tenements. (together, the Deferred Consideration). o The issue of the securities constituting the Upfront Consideration and Deferred Consideration will be issued out of the Company’s existing capacity pursuant to ASX Listing Rule 7.1. The binding agreement otherwise contains terms and conditions considered standard for agreements of this nature. ASX has also determined that there is no requirement for the Company to seek its shareholders' approval under Listing Rule 11.1.2 for, nor to re-comply with ASX's admission tests prior to, the Acquisition detailed above. Background on the Central Rutile and Weaver Projects The Central Rutile Project consists of 5 exploration permits (Nganda, Bounde, Kombo, Alamba and Nsimbo) under valid applications covering 2,124km2 across an area rapidly emerging as a globally significant rutile province within Central Cameroon. The Weaver Project consists of 6 exploration permits (Awae, Ayene II, Assi, Bissoua 2, Soleye and Soleye West) under valid applications covering 2,850km2. The project area is predominantly underlain by kyanitebearing mica schist bedrock, which is considered the primary source of rutile. During in-situ weathering, rutile is liberated from the bedrock and progressively concentrated and upgraded within the overlying saprolite layer. This forms an in-situ, eluvial saprolite hosted rutile deposit target type deposit analogous to Sovereign Metal’s Tier 1 Kasiya deposit in Malawi (the world’s largest primary rutile deposit at 1.8 billion tons at 1.0% rutile). dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 8 The exploration model further proposes that subsequent erosion and fluvial transport rework these materials, concentrating rutile and other valuable heavy minerals into alluvial deposits. Historical production figures from the area between 1935 and 1955 have recorded some 15,000 tons of high purity (>95 %) rutile being produced from artisanal mining of the alluvial deposits around Nanga-Eboko. The Central Rutile Project borders Peak Mineral’s Minta Rutile Project where initial sampling has revealed widespread, high-value mineral assemblages with valuable heavy minerals (VHM) up to 93% of total heavy minerals (THM) and with the dominant VHM’s being rutile (up to 69.8%), monazite (up to 35.6%) and zircon (up to 21.5%) (see PUA Announcement “First systematic exploration programme discovers significant rutile province in Cameroon” dated 4 February 2025). Figure 9: Map showing DY6’s total landholding in Central Cameroon which includes the Douala Basin HMS Project and the newly expanded Central Rutile Project. -ENDSThis announcement has been authorised by the Board of DY6. More information Mr Daniel Smith Mr John Kay Mr Cliff Fitzhenry Executive Chairman Director & Company Secretary Technical Consultant dan.smith@dy6metals.com john.kay@dy6metals.com Clifford.fitzhenry@dy6metals.com dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 9 Competent Person Statement The information contained in this announcement that relates to geological information and exploration results at the Central Rutile Project, is based on information compiled by Mr Richard Stockwell, a Competent Person who is a Fellow of The Australian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Stockwell is a consultant to the company and has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves’. Mr Stockwell consents to the inclusion in this announcement of the matters based on his information in the form and context in which it appears. Forward-Looking Statements This announcement may include forward-looking statements and opinions. Forward-looking statements, opinions and estimates are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions which are outside the control of DY6 Metals Ltd. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance and no representation or warranty is made as to the likelihood of achievement or reasonableness of any forward-looking statements, opinions or estimates. Actual values, results or events may be materially different to those expressed or implied in this announcement. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place reliance on forward-looking statements, opinions or estimates. Any forward-looking statements, opinions or estimates in this announcement speak only at the date of issue of this announcement. Subject to any continuing obligations under applicable law and the ASX Listing Rules, DY6 does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any information or any of the forward-looking statements opinions or estimates in this announcement or any changes in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such disclosures are based. Appendix: Table 4: Licence tenement details of the DY6’s Douala Basin HMS and Central Rutile Projects in Cameroon. Tenement Name Project Name Holder Application Date Area Granted Date Mungo Mbanga Maleke Diwong Mbongo Edea Sud Nganda Nsimbo Kombo Bounde Alamba Awae Ayene II Assi Bissoua _II Soleye Soleye_W Douala Douala Douala Douala Douala Douala Central Central Central Central Central Central Central Central Central Central Central Rhino Resources Ltd Rhino Resources Ltd Rhino Resources Ltd Rhino Resources Ltd Rhino Resources Ltd Rhino Resources Ltd Gorilla Mining Ltd Gorilla Mining Ltd Gorilla Mining Ltd Gorilla Mining Ltd Gorilla Mining Ltd Weaver Resources Ltd Weaver Resources Ltd Weaver Resources Ltd Weaver Resources Ltd Weaver Resources Ltd Weaver Resources Ltd 29/06/2022 29/06/2022 30/01/2024 30/01/2024 30/09/2022 29/06/2022 19/02/2025 19/02/2025 19/02/2025 19/02/2025 19/02/2025 07/07/2025 07/07/2025 07/07/2025 07/07/2025 23/06/2025 23/06/2025 483km2 468km2 491km2 484km2 214km2 440km2 396km2 495km2 460km2 425km2 348km2 462km2 497km2 488km2 441km2 466km2 496km2 14/12/2022 14/12/2022 N/A N/A N/A 14/12/2022 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 10 JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1 report Section 1 – Sampling Techniques and Data Criteria Sampling Techniques JORC Code explanation Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling. Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used. Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report. In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases, more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information. Commentary Auger Drilling • Samples collected using a manual hand auger with a 75 mm and 100mm diameter bit. • Drilling targeted weathered saprolite profiles • Samples taken at regular 1 m intervals downhole from surface (maximum ~9 m). • No lithological (horizons) were crossed in sampling. • Industry-standard practice was used in the processing of samples for assay. Channel sampling • Channel samples were collected along exposed road cuttings and in the filed • Channels were cleared of loose debris, weathered material, and vegetation prior to sampling. • Samples collected at consistent 1 m intervals • No lithological (horizons) were crossed while sampling • Industry-standard practice was used in the processing of samples for assay. Stream sediment sampling • Sediment samples were collected from active high and low stream channels for visual confirmation only. • Targeted locations included inner bends, sediment traps • ~1 kg of sediment collected using a shovel or trowel for panning. • Sample information was recorder at the time of sampling included, colour, lithology, texture, stream location and mineralization. • The sample was only collected for visual confirmation and no assays will be completed on stream sediment samples released in this release Cautionary statement. The visual representation of heavy mineral (HM) and rutile mineralisation shown in this release is based on preliminary visual reconnaissance with no sampling results. Assay results are pending and have not yet been verified through laboratory analysis and expected in September 2025. Investors are cautioned that the information is indicative only and should not be relied upon as a definitive measure of mineralisation or economic potential. Further exploration and analytical testing are required to confirm the extent, grade, and economic viability of the mineralisation. dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 11 Drilling techniques Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face- sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc) Auger drilling • Vertical hand auger drilling conducted using a manually rotated auger with 75 mm and 100mm diameter bit. • Drilling continued until blade refusal. • Maximum hole depth varied by terrain (generally <9 m). • No drilling fluids, casing, or downhole equipment used. • Drilling suitable for near-surface geochemical sampling. Drill sample recovery Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed. Auger Drilling • Hand auger drilling does not provide continuous core; recovery is based on volume retrieved per 1m interval. • Sample quality and recovery were monitored in the field and deemed acceptable; any compromised samples were noted and excluded if necessary. • No specific measures (e.g., twin holes, weights, or drilling additives) were used to improve recovery, as hand auger is a basic geochemical technique. Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples. Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material. Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies. Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged. Auger Drilling • Sample information was recorder at the time of sampling included colour, lithology, texture, alteration, moisture and mineralization. • GPS coordinates recorded at each site using handheld GPS (±5 m accuracy). Channel sampling • Sample information was recorder at the time of sampling included colour, lithology, texture, alteration, moisture and mineralization. • GPS coordinates recorded at each site using handheld GPS (±5 m accuracy). Stream sediment sampling • Sample information was recorder at the time of sampling included, colour, lithology, texture, stream location and mineralization. • GPS coordinates recorded at each site using handheld GPS (±5 m accuracy). dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 12 Sub- sampling techniques and sample preparation If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken. If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. Auger, Channel and Streams samples were panned in the field • Material was manually panned in the field to produce a heavy mineral concentrate (~200g). • Panning aimed to concentrate rutile and other heavy minerals for visible assessment For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of samples. Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the insitu material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling. Quality of assay data and laboratory tests Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled. The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total. • • Not applicable in this release Assays pending For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc. Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie lack of bias) and precision have been established Verification of sampling and assaying The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel. The use of twinned holes. • • • • No third-party verification recorded. No twinned boreholes were drilled. Not recorded in the documentation provided to the consultant. No adjustments to data have been recorded. Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols. Location of data points Discuss any adjustment to assay data. Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation. Auger, Channel, Grab and stream sediment sampling • Hand-held Garmin G65S GPS. • UTM WGS84 Sector 33N. Specification of the grid system used. Quality and adequacy of topographic control dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 13 Data spacing and distribution Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied. • • • Data spacing is not applicable for the release. Reconnaissance program is not sufficient to establish a Mineral resource and or reserve Samples were composited on length weighted basis to calculate weighted average grades downhole. Whether sample compositing has been applied. Orientation of data in relation to geological structure Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type. • • If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material. The measures taken to ensure sample security. • • Sample security The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data. • Drilling is completed in a vertical orientation with hand auger sampler orientated by eye. The program is at an early reconnaissance stage and was designed to test surface and near-surface stratigraphy in residual regolith material. All holes were drilled vertically. No clear mineralised structures have been identified to date, and no sampling bias due to drilling orientation is considered material at this stage. All samples were collected and accounted for by DY6 employees/consultants. All samples were bagged into plastic bags and closed with cable ties. The appropriate manifest of sample numbers and a sample submission form containing laboratory instructions will be submitted to the laboratory on delivery to South Africa No independent audits or reviews data have been undertaken. Audits or reviews Section 2: Reporting of Exploration Results Criteria Mineral tenement and land tenure status Exploration done by other parties JORC Code explanation Commentary Type, reference name/number, location and ownership including agreements or material issues with third parties such as joint ventures, partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests, historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental settings. Refer Appendix 1. Mungo, Mbanga and Mbongo are granted Permits held in name of Rhino Resources Ltd. Maleke, Edea Sud and Diwong (formerly Missole) are Permit applications by Rhino Resources. Nganda, Nsimbo, Kombo, Bounde and Alamba are all Permit applications by Gorilla Mining Ltd. Awae, Ayene II, Assi, Bissoua II, Soleye and Soleye W are Permit applications by Weaver Resources Ltd. The security of the tenure held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to obtaining a licence to operate in the area Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other parties. No expiry date set. No impediments. The company is not aware of any historical exploration done on the Central project related to this release dy6metals.com | ASX:DY6 14 Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of mineralisation. Drill hole Information A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill holes: o easting and northing of the drill hole collar o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole collar o dip and azimuth of the hole o down hole length and interception depth o hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case. Data aggregation methods In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high-grade results and longer lengths of low-grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated. Relationship between mineralisation widths and intercept lengths These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement to this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not kn